🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to find the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.