🔗 Share this article

I possess some thoughts regarding the remarks made by ESPN commentator a well-known announcer following Novak Djokovic's win over the American player in the US Open last eight. Consider – Fritz is the United States, Fowler is from the US – and athletic competitions frequently lend themselves to nationalism. A little bit of letdown was understandable. Rather, he invoked the continued drought of American men at grand slam tournaments: not one of them has won a trophy since the last American champion in 2003, and he had been the last one standing in the competition.

We all love a storyline, myself included. But really. Even if the American defeated Djokovic for the initial occasion, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was looming in the following match, who he has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And if he’d someway gotten past that, it would have been title holder Jannik Sinner, versus him the American had lost 10 of the last 11 sets. The two young stars had also divided the previous seven major titles (plus Alcaraz went on to thrash a fatigued Djokovic in the subsequent match). He said in press following his defeat that he in fact preferred his path, because it presented the opportunity to beat the three best players in the sport in succession. Fritz is well within his right to aim for the achievement; an athlete is meant to have faith in themselves. But going into that Djokovic last eight match who else in their right mind had the drought of US winners in mind?

The American star's second serve the only thing standing in her way and sustained success

Fritz, twenty-eight, is ranked number four in the world entering this week’s ATP World Tour Finals and has won his previous six matches over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. Presumably he might claim that position for himself in the coming years. But evidently that at present, that’s as far as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz lie a vast gap of ranking points away. Fritz’s top-class serve and powerful strength on each forehand and backhand are more than enough to dispose of most opponents on the ATP tour. When facing the select few once-in-a-lifetime players, however, he is frequently overmatched. The last several seasons has witnessed the curious emergence of lanky, towering athletes who can nevertheless cover the court with the alarming quickness and grace of smaller players. He is six-foot-five and appears that way. His footwork is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he seldom win a rally that the opponent was controlling, and playing a soft shot versus him is typically a safe bet. That acts as a quite severe restriction on his potential.

Fritz has achieved a several significant, unexpected improvements over the years. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was circling the lower end of the top 30. Two years later, he was approaching the top 10. The previous season, he unexpectedly exploded to No 4 – and held the position. But the next leap, mixing it up with and beating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, the Italian, and including a declining Serbian, is the highest of all. What could Fowler have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the continuing drought of US male players lifting grand slams when Fritz had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The desperation is just excessive and the respect for the magnitude of the challenge too little.

The American star achieved a career-best advancement to the Wimbledon last four in the summer.

Fritz’s performance in that very quarter-final ought to have been sufficient of an sign. Djokovic won in four sets, a victory that only felt tenuous for brief periods towards the very end, when the American had survived a few match points and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The pair looked evenly matched during the rallies, with the American earning numerous opportunities to break. But the champion saved break point after break point, extending the streak to the brink of agony. When Fritz finally did claim a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he promptly played a terrible service game to drop serve once more; Djokovic had drawn him into a battle peripheral to the real battle and compelled him to use excessive energy to win it. Facing set points in the final game, his primary delivery floated to the sky. He extended the contest two times on his backup delivery, but finally committed two errors. It was not a collapse, in my opinion, only a consequence of having to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The match was fairly compelling proof that Fritz is insufficiently skilled to defeat any form of Djokovic, that was defeated by the Spaniard in the next round and did not particularly appeared like he thought he could win. This is perfectly fine – the Serbian is the best player ever, and may not be at the peak of his athletic abilities anymore, but has acquired enough experience and tactical know-how to make up for quite a bit of the decline. The issue is the individuals who were expecting the American to win, and pressuring him to do so, when he was yet to accomplished anything that suggested he could.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the tour regardless. He’s a calm, thoughtful presence in media sessions, more so than virtually everyone on the men's tour except for the Russian star, prepared to not just express how he feels or the strategy he felt determined a contest, but clarify it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the blame for the United States not produce a male major champion since the last American titlist feels unjust. (Since the fellow American is competing alongside him in the rankings, maybe they can divide that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Player Divisions

Jimmy Connors Group

• The Spanish phenom
• The American contender
• The Australian speedster
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Group

• The Italian champion
• The German powerhouse
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably dwell on it indefinitely if I don’t accomplish it,” the American informed a journalist in the summer of winning a grand slam. It is hoped he realizes that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t fulfill that goal, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s young, terrifying reign is in fact highly improbable for all other players. {